Abstract:
The research aimed to analyze the effect of IBL on student academic performance as
well as gender differences and student perceptions in the circulatory system. The
study employed a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control groups,
which was based on constructivist learning theory from Piaget (1952) and Vygotsky
(1978). The study sample consisted of 60 Form 2 Home Economics students who
were separated into an experimental group that learned through IBL and a control
group that experienced traditional teaching methods. The study used pre-tests together
with post-tests and student perception questionnaires as data collection tools, which
were analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The findings
demonstrated that IBL students achieved statistically better academic outcomes since
their average test results rose from 65.1 to 80.2, while control group students showed
an increase from 64.5 to 70.3. The study revealed no meaningful gender gap in
academic results, which means IBL works equally well for male and female learners.
The results from the post-test evaluation demonstrated that students who learned
through IBL achieved higher results when compared to those who learned through
traditional teaching methods according to the independent samples t-test which
produced t(58) = 4.35, p < 0.001. The majority of students who experienced IBL
instruction reported positive feedback because it improved their engagement levels
and critical thinking abilities and made biology lessons more enjoyable. The study
established that IBL functions as an efficient pedagogical method that boosts students'
understanding of biology concepts together with their academic results and biological
study motivation. Though further research is required to investigate the long-term
impact of IBL, various educational settings and educators are advised to implement
IBL methods in biology lessons while providing educational resources and teacher
training to achieve successful adoption of this approach.
Description:
A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in
partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Award
of the Degree of Master of Philosophy
(Science Education)
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE EDUCATION
FACULTY OF SCIENCE EDUCATION,
UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA
JUNE, 2025