| dc.description.abstract |
This study explored the financial governance system of basic education in the Gomoa
West District of Ghana, with a focus on how resource allocation, funding adequacy,
and governance practices influence the quality of education. Guided by the
assumption that quality education can be improved through a more effective and
streamlined financial governance regime, the study was anchored in the philosophical
assumptions of constructivism and interpretivism. A qualitative research approach
was employed, using a case study design to gain in-depth insights into the financial
management practices of selected schools and the district directorate. The study
purposively sampled 12 participants, comprising three district education officers and
nine head teachers from schools benefiting from both the Capitation Grant and the
Ghana Accountability for Learning Outcomes Project (GALOP) fund. Data was
collected through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to code and
interpret data in alignment with theories of educational adequacy, efficiency, and the
principal-agent framework. Key findings revealed that while budgeting systems such
as SPIP ensure policy alignment and accountability, funding remains woefully
inadequate and irregularly disbursed. Supplementary sources such as Parent
Associations, religious contributions, extra classes and NGOs provide support but are
limited and unsustainable. The study recommends increased statutory funding, regular
disbursement of grants, capacity building in financial management, flexibility in
school financial management and greater stakeholder involvement to enhance
financial governance and educational outcome |
en_US |