Chieftaincy succession disputes in Awutu Senya implications for social cohesion and community development

Abstract

Chieftaincy succession disputes pose significant challenges to traditional governance, social cohesion, and community development. This study explored the chieftaincy succession conflict between the Twedan and Anona clans in Awutu Senya, examining its causes, political dimensions, and implications for social and developmental outcomes. Using qualitative research through exploratory case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with sub-chiefs, politicians, community members, and opinion leaders, as well as through document analysis. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns and themes within the data. The findings revealed that the dispute is rooted in ambiguous succession practices, historical grievances, and leadership failures, compounded by disrupted enstoolment rituals. Political alignments, with the Twedan clan associated with the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the Anona clan with the New Patriotic Party (NPP), have intensified the conflict, transforming it into a broader socio-political struggle. The dispute has significantly fragmented social cohesion, eroded trust, and stalled community development, with rival factions obstructing initiatives perceived as benefiting opposing groups. The study concluded that there is an urgent need to depoliticize traditional governance, restore ritual practices, and strengthen leadership accountability to mitigate these conflicts. The study‘s recommendations included codifying succession guidelines, fostering neutral mediation, and implementing inclusive development frameworks. The study also emphasized the importance of integrating traditional and modern governance to resolve such disputes effectively.