Abstract:
Since the resolution of the intractable Dagbon conflict in 2019, little academic works
have been done to track the progress, prospects, viability and sustainability of the
peace currently being experienced in Dagbon. This study therefore obtained the
perception of key stakeholders in Dagbon regarding the resolution of the conflict;
assessed the role of stakeholders in the sustainability of the peace in Dagbon;
examined the activities and programmes being implemented to promote and maintain
the peace, and identified key lessons learned by stakeholders in the course of the
Dagbon peace efforts. A qualitative research method was used. Twenty (20)
participants were interviewed with a semi-structured interview guide as the data
collection instrument. The study found out that; the respondents were generally
enthused by the way the conflict was resolved. Also, it was revealed that the
respondents performed various functions to achieve the following; improved security
in Dagbon, acceleration in developmental projects, and improvements in media
works. It was discovered that little or no attention has been paid to the design of
programmes or activities to sustain the peace in Dagbon. One of the key lessons
highlighted by the respondents was that, the use of violence or unconventional
methods to ascend to the Yani Skin, is no longer feasible except for the use of the laid
down principles, conventions, values, customs and traditions of Dagbon. The study
concludes that, the 2019 resolution of the Dagbon conflict was a huge blessing for the
Kingdom. However certain underlying issues such as the inability of stakeholders to
constitute a reconciliatory programme to heal wounds, the chieftaincy disputes in
Nanton and Karaga, could reverse the gains. The study therefore recommends the
establishment of a peace and reconciliation programme to be established by the King
to enhance dialogue between the two rival factions. The leadership of this programme
should consist of influential people from both gates, to make their resolutions
acceptable and satisfactory to both sides.
Description:
A thesis in the Department of Political Science Education, Faculty of
of Social Sciences Education, submitted to the School of
Graduate Studies, in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Philosophy
(Political Science Education)
in the University of Education, Winneba
