UEWScholar Repository

Textural Analysis for Medicinal Plants Identification Using Log Gabor Filters

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Twum F.
dc.contributor.author Missah Y.M.
dc.contributor.author Oppong S.O.
dc.contributor.author Ussiph N.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-31T15:05:04Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-31T15:05:04Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 21693536
dc.identifier.other 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3196788
dc.identifier.uri http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/213
dc.description Twum, F., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Kumasi, Ghana; Missah, Y.M., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Kumasi, Ghana; Oppong, S.O., University of Education, Department of Ict Education, Winneba, Ghana; Ussiph, N., Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science, Kumasi, Ghana en_US
dc.description.abstract Texture plays a crucial role in computer vision, providing valuable information about image regions. Log Gabor filters that mimic the human eye's visual cortex are used as feature extractors to identify medicinal plants based on the leaf textural features. This method was tested on a dataset developed from the Centre of Plant Medicine Research, Ghana, consisting of forty-nine (49) plant species as well as the Flavia and Swedish Leaf datasets, which are benchmark datasets. The Log Gabor filter outperformed the Gabor filters, which have been extensively used in this area when tested on nine supervised classifiers (K-Nearest Neighbour, Support Vector Machine, Na�ve Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision tree, Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, Gradient Boosting and Stochastic Gradient Descent) with 10-fold cross-validation. The Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron were the best performing classifiers for both Log Gabor filter and Gabor filter in terms of accuracy, precision, true positive rate, F1 score and false positive rate. The Log Gabor filter's highest accuracy was 79% for Mydatastet, 97% for Flavia, and 98% for the Swedish Leaf dataset whiles the Gabor filter's highest accuracy was 66% for Mydatastet, 92% for Flavia and 96% for the Swedish Leaf dataset. � 2013 IEEE. en_US
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. en_US
dc.subject Gabor filter en_US
dc.subject log Gabor filter en_US
dc.subject medicinal plants en_US
dc.subject supervised classifiers en_US
dc.subject Texture en_US
dc.title Textural Analysis for Medicinal Plants Identification Using Log Gabor Filters en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UEWScholar


Browse

My Account